Opinion

EDITORIAL: Should we consider a vehicle levy?

Once again, the spectre of a vehicle levy is rising from the political grave. What was once kryptonite for politicians is now, thanks to chronic underfunding of TransLink, a potential reality, according to Metro Vancouver mayors.

But would paying an extra $50 to $100 per car, depending on the vehicle’s size and emissions, be so bad? Perhaps, it would be a more palatable alternative than a complicated road pricing system, at least in the short term.

With Aircare on its last legs and most new car owners absolved of the responsibility of paying this $40 fee every two years, perhaps the cash for car use could be switched to general operating revenues for the transportation authority.

While a vehicle levy may not solve all of TransLink’s problems in the long term, it could be a short-term fix, collected by ICBC with insurance renewal to fund road and transit improvements over the next political horizon.

Would you support a $50-$100 vehicle levy to keep buses running and pay for transportation improvements? Vote in our online poll.

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Community Events, April 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Apr 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.