Opinion

NELSON: Attack ads hurt understanding

Political attack ads work but they’re ugly and unhelpful.

Negative sound bites, purposely misconstrued things dredged up out of a rival’s past, statements taken out of context, exaggerated accusations — they all work because they are easy for a disinterested electorate to digest.

But just because attack ads work doesn’t mean they’re helpful, useful or moral.

I suppose, as my colleague correctly points out, elections may be more likely won by a good mudslinger. But is it better to win at any cost or to maintain one’s political dignity?

Unlike spirited partisan debate and argument, attack ads don’t clarify issues, they cloud them.

Their purpose is simple: They want to anger base supporters into getting out to vote, volunteering and donating money to the cause. They seek to stoke the anger and fear of their partisan supporters, to serve up raw meat to encourage the renewal of the fight against a ginned-up boogeyman.

Most important, and the reason such attack ads work so well, is that they appeal to voters with either a vague knowledge of, or indifference to, politics; voters for whom a repeated slogan is easier to grasp than an actual policy.

But much worse, attack ads of the type we have seen early in this provincial election cycle are more than misleading and not nice — they harm our democracy.

Attack ads discourage even a minimal understanding of election issues.

In addition, they breed cynicism about politics. They demean politicians and government, convincing people that politics is not an honourable activity and that government is the enemy.

Alarmingly, in the recent U.S. election, the parties even discovered negative attack ads featuring outright lies about their opponent worked just as well as mere distortions because the average voter hears the slogan but doesn’t get around to unraveling the lie.

In our current provincial election, one leader is trying to maintain his political dignity by not stooping to using attack ads. God knows it must be difficult. I can think of no political leader who has ever faced an opponent whose government’s actions offer so much scope for negative attack ads.

Still, even though attack ads “work,” using them is political bullying, to which we voters should just say no.

Where’s my pink shirt?

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

COLUMN: Local elections: the good, the bad and the ugly
 
Port Moody to deal with Metro Vancouver legal action in new year
 
Hit and run victim identified
School district to add staff
 
COLUMN: Oh, the headlines that might have been
 
EDITORIAL: Team players
UNCOMMON SENSE: Atheists can enjoy Christmas regardless of Christ
 
GUEST COLUMN: Clean coal is an oxymoron
 
‘Rogue broker’ fined, banned from practise

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 26 edition online now. Browse the archives.