Skip to content

Letters: Development and density in Port Moody

The Editor, Re. “Higher densities for some parts of PoMo” (The Tri-City News, Oct. 13).
inlet station

The Editor, 

Re. “Higher densities for some parts of PoMo” (The Tri-City News, Oct. 13). 

According to The Tri-City News’ report, at a recent city council meeting in Port Moody, the topic of higher-density redevelopment was vigorously debated. It was stated: “Coun. Diana Dilworth said measuring the impact of development on road congestion is hard to pin down.”

Fortunately, TransLink has a regional road network model to assess the impact of land use change on morning peak hour trip generation and road congestion.

The city of Port Moody could commission a transportation study, using the EMME/2 regional model, to investigate the impact of the Flavelle, Ioco and other redevelopments on our major roads.

A study might be pointless as the city would forego property tax revenue if it capped redevelopment while TransLink has to pay for regional road improvements.

D.B. Wilson, Port Moody

 

‘DISMAYED’

The Editor,

I am dismayed and angry with Port Moody city council for passing the bylaw to prioritize higher density development in areas well-served by public transit.

This amendment overrides Port Moody’s official community plan, which was supported by many PoMo citizens.

Does this higher density development include additional libraries, schools, and indoor and outdoor facilities such as ice rinks, swimming pools, gyms, and parks and playing fields, all of which will be needed?

E. Odynsky, Port Moody