Skip to content

Letter: Tri-Cities have a lot of work to do on cycling routes

If Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam and Port Moody want to encourage human-powered mobility, they need to improve and expand bike routes, says the letter writer
Gatensbury climb
The average gradient on the Gatensbury hill may be about 12%, but it has pitches steeper than 18%, making it a challenge for pedestrians and cyclists ascending its new multi-use path on the west side.

The Editor:

Re. "Plenty of bike routes — but plenty of gaps, too" (The Tri-City News, March 12).

As a utility (and former commuter) cyclist, I eagerly downloaded and read the recent State of Cycling report by the regional bicycling organization HUB and TransLink.

On one hand, I was encouraged because the bike route maps showed clearly the north-south connectivity gap. The multi-use path on Gatensbury Street is too steep even after recent improvements. Surely, there must be a route in a municipal park for a multi-use path to zigzag up the Chines bluff that would be suitable for recreational and kid cyclists. 

On the other hand, I was discouraged by the high ranking of the east-west routes through Port Moody, which lack connectivity. For instance, most of Barnet Highway was given a green rating but I would never take my wife or children on this busy arterial with cars, trucks and SUVs hurtling by.

The Tri-Cities have done much to make cycling easier and safer but this report showed that more project spending is needed to encourage human-powered mobility.

Derek Wilson, Port Moody

Read more about cycling in the Tri-Cities:

These trails are where to cycle safely in Coquitlam and Port Coquitlam

If you built it, will they climb?

Port Moody cyclist wins $1-milion payout for Vancouver accident