Skip to content

NELSON: If society did its job properly...

FACE TO FACE: What could possibly be wrong with giving to charity? When I give to charity, I don't feel good - I feel guilty.

FACE TO FACE: What could possibly be wrong with giving to charity?


When I give to charity, I don't feel good - I feel guilty. Charities help us believe that we have only individual, rather than collective, responsibility for operating children's hospitals, food banks or programs to help the hungry.

I'm not against "charity," the biblical concept. What I question are "charities" - the private gathering of money and material through the Herculean efforts of religious and secular groups in an attempt to offset hunger, disease or pestilence.

That the less fortunate among us should depend on individual acts of heroism by Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, my Face to Face colleague or me in order to eat, drink water or survive should not be acceptable to us. In these days of technological advancement, when we can produce so much more, in so much less time, surely we can do better than adopting a single child from among the multitudes, many of whom will die if they aren't chosen in the haphazard lottery of private charity.

There are peripheral reasons why charities are counterproductive. A donation of a can of garbanzo beans to Share Family and Community Services' food bank - which helps feed hundreds of Tri-City families - may help salve our conscience but it also helps perpetuate an increasingly skewed economic status quo. Giving to the food bank, although altruistic, helps absolve us of our portion of culpability for the plight of the starving in our community.

Most charities serve up religious or political dogma with any powdered milk that actually makes it to the target group, after the 50% or more "administrative costs" are skimmed off. Few of the millions of charitable dollars donated have reached the Haitian people. Self-gratification seems as important as is allaying the suffering of others.

But these are just the minor indictments of charities. The real problem with charities is that they depend on individual conscience rather than on collective responsibility to help the world's downtrodden.

Collective, extensive and co-ordinated plans for helping the needy should be the minimum requirement of all political jurisdictions. We should demand it of the governments we entrust with organizing our world.

For us to rely on myriad private charities to panhandle individual consciences for donations is an ineffective and insensitive way to help our needy.